The Maginot Line was state-of-the-art, lavishly funded — and strategically flawed. When Germany invaded in 1940, it simply went around the fortifications through Belgium.
That is what happens when you prepare for the last war.
And that is exactly what many investors do when they try to time the market.
The timing trap
Ask anyone who has sold equities “just in time” to avoid a crash, and they will tell you how hard it is to do it twice. Selling is only the first step. The second — getting back in — is often even harder.
A few realities investors underestimate:
You will likely get the timing wrong. It is not enough to predict a fall. You must also predict when it happens and how deep it will be.
If markets keep rising after you sell, the emotional stress is real. Many investors remain stuck in cash, waiting endlessly for a correction that does not arrive.
When corrections finally come, fear peaks. Media coverage amplifies panic, and very few investors actually find the courage to re-enter at lower levels.
The alpha myth
Let’s assume — generously — that you get everything right.
You move 30% of your portfolio to cash just before a 20% correction, and reinvest perfectly at the bottom. This is the dream scenario for every market timer.
But what does it really deliver?
Over a 10-year horizon, the additional return — the so-called “alpha” — is only about 1 percentage point per year compared to an investor who simply stayed invested.
To put this in perspective:
Two investors start with ₹1 crore in equities, assuming a 12% CAGR over 10 years. In the first year, the market falls by 20%.
Investor A (buy-and-hold): He stays invested through the fall and compounds uninterrupted. After 10 years, his portfolio grows to about ₹2.22 crore.
Investor B (perfect timer): He shifts 30% to cash before the fall, reinvests exactly at the bottom, and then stays invested. His portfolio grows to around ₹2.43 crore.
Even with flawless execution, the difference is roughly ₹22 lakh over a decade — translating to just a 1% higher CAGR. And that assumes no hesitation, no delays, and no missed days.
Fighting yesterday’s war
Much like the Maginot Line, market-timing strategies are usually shaped by the last crisis we remember — the previous crash, the last panic. They are backward-looking defences in a forward-moving market.
The real enemy is not volatility.
It is reactionary behaviour — panic selling, performance chasing, and sitting on cash for months or years waiting for the “right” moment.
What works instead
If timing does not work — or does not work well enough — what should investors do?
Adopt strategic asset allocation: Decide your equity exposure based on goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon.
Focus on time in the market, not timing the market: Long-term participation and compounding matter far more than short-term tactical moves.
Process over prediction
There is calm in having a process. Investors who follow asset allocation find volatile periods easier to handle. Instead of fearing corrections, they see them as opportunities to rebalance.
Market timing, by contrast, demands constant vigilance and emotional energy — and more often than not, ends in regret.
As Peter Lynch famously said:
“Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections or trying to anticipate corrections than has been lost in the corrections themselves.”
Your job as an investor is not to predict the next storm. It is to build a ship that can sail through it. For most people, that ship is not market timing — it is a disciplined, long-term plan built on asset allocation and patience.
Like the Maginot Line, timing strategies may look impressive, feel reassuring, and cost a lot. But when the real test arrives, they rarely deliver the protection investors expect.
Saurabh Mittal is a registered investment advisor and founder of Circle Wealth Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Views are personal.
About the Author
